↓ Skip to main content

Predicting survival from colorectal cancer histology slides using deep learning: A retrospective multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
55 X users
patent
20 patents

Readers on

mendeley
705 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 705 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 705 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 16%
Researcher 84 12%
Student > Master 74 10%
Other 29 4%
Student > Bachelor 28 4%
Other 89 13%
Unknown 286 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 126 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 91 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 8%
Engineering 47 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 2%
Other 55 8%
Unknown 313 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2026.
All research outputs
#919,540
of 34,327,810 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,254
of 5,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,625
of 486,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#24
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,327,810 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.