You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lytic Therapy for Retained Traumatic Hemothorax A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brandon S Hendriksen, Marcos T Kuroki, Scott B Armen, Michael F Reed, Matthew D Taylor, Christopher S Hollenbeak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#3,754
of 13,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,468
of 446,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#45
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.