↓ Skip to main content

CYP2D6-guided opioid therapy improves pain control in CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizers: a pragmatic clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CYP2D6-guided opioid therapy improves pain control in CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizers: a pragmatic clinical trial
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41436-018-0431-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Max Smith, Kristin W. Weitzel, Amanda R. Elsey, Taimour Langaee, Yan Gong, Dyson T. Wake, Benjamin Q. Duong, Melanie Hagen, Christopher A. Harle, Elvira Mercado, Ying Nagoshi, Kimberly Newsom, Ashleigh Wright, Eric I. Rosenberg, Petr Starostik, Michael J. Clare-Salzler, Siegfried O. Schmidt, Roger B. Fillingim, Julie A. Johnson, Larisa H. Cavallari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Professor 7 5%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 51 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 57 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,910,124
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#659
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,379
of 446,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#22
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.