You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adapting health interventions for local fit when scaling-up: a realist review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Power, Brynne Gilmore, Frédérique Vallières, Elaine Toomey, Hasheem Mannan, Eilish McAuliffe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 15 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
| Senegal | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 52% |
| Scientists | 12 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,889,975
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#3,600
of 25,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,033
of 446,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#125
of 701 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 701 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.