↓ Skip to main content

Effects of alternating standing and sitting compared to prolonged sitting on cerebrovascular hemodynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Sport Sciences for Health, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Effects of alternating standing and sitting compared to prolonged sitting on cerebrovascular hemodynamics
Published in
Sport Sciences for Health, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11332-019-00526-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophy J. Perdomo, Bethany Barone Gibbs, Robert J. Kowalsky, John M. Taormina, Jeffrey R. Balzer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 15 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,824,728
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from Sport Sciences for Health
#186
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,990
of 440,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sport Sciences for Health
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.