↓ Skip to main content

Engagement with Peer-Supported Vocational Networks: Recovered Iranian Substance Users’ Perspectives and Practices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 128)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Engagement with Peer-Supported Vocational Networks: Recovered Iranian Substance Users’ Perspectives and Practices
Published in
Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40737-016-0072-7
Authors

Masoomeh Maarefvand, Naghmeh Babaeian, Sahar Rezazadeh, Jagdish Khubchandani

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,850,689
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
#23
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,770
of 417,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.