You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Modified constraint‐induced therapy for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04086.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
MARGARET WALLEN, JENNY ZIVIANI, OLIVIA NAYLOR, RUTH EVANS, IONA NOVAK, ROBERT D HERBERT |
Abstract |
Conventional constraint-based therapies are intensive and demanding to implement, particularly for children. Modified forms of constraint-based therapies that are family-centred may be more acceptable and feasible for families of children with cerebral palsy (CP)-but require rigorous evaluation using randomized trials. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of modified constraint-induced therapy compared with intensive occupational therapy on activities of daily living and upper limb outcomes in children with hemiplegic CP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 268 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 49 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 41 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
Researcher | 14 | 5% |
Other | 51 | 18% |
Unknown | 80 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 15 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 11 | 4% |
Other | 34 | 12% |
Unknown | 89 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,713,861
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#1,575
of 4,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,180
of 129,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.