↓ Skip to main content

Implementing TMB measurement in clinical practice: considerations on assay requirements

Overview of attention for article published in ESMO Open, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
267 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing TMB measurement in clinical practice: considerations on assay requirements
Published in
ESMO Open, January 2019
DOI 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reinhard Büttner, John W Longshore, Fernando López-Ríos, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Nicola Normanno, Etienne Rouleau, Frédérique Penault-Llorca

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Student > Master 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 12 5%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 90 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 102 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,860,394
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from ESMO Open
#107
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,345
of 446,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ESMO Open
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.