| Title |
Development and use of biomaterials as wound healing therapies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Burns & Trauma, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41038-018-0139-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachael Zoe Murray, Zoe Elizabeth West, Allison June Cowin, Brooke Louise Farrugia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 38% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Denmark | 1 | 8% |
| China | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 295 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 15% |
| Researcher | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 118 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 12% |
| Engineering | 24 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 18 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 18% |
| Unknown | 128 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,616,010
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Burns & Trauma
#27
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,085
of 446,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns & Trauma
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.