↓ Skip to main content

Extending access to a web-based mental health intervention: who wants more, what happens to use over time, and is it helpful? Results of a concealed, randomized controlled extension study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Extending access to a web-based mental health intervention: who wants more, what happens to use over time, and is it helpful? Results of a concealed, randomized controlled extension study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2030-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M. Hensel, James Shaw, Noah M. Ivers, Laura Desveaux, Simone N. Vigod, Zachary Bouck, Nike Onabajo, Payal Agarwal, Geetha Mukerji, Rebecca Yang, Megan Nguyen, Lianne Jeffs, Trevor Jamieson, R. Sacha Bhatia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 64 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 72 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,030,998
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,281
of 4,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,920
of 437,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#90
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.