↓ Skip to main content

Inclusion of children in the initial conversation about their cancer diagnosis: impact on parent experiences of the communication process

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Inclusion of children in the initial conversation about their cancer diagnosis: impact on parent experiences of the communication process
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00520-019-4653-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah R. Brand McCarthy, Tammy I. Kang, Jennifer W. Mack

Abstract

Including children in medical conversations is considered the standard of care for children with cancer. However, previous qualitative research has raised concerns about how the child's presence impacts the parent's communication experience. The current study examines the frequency and impact of child presence during a serious medical conversation on the parent's communication experience in pediatric oncology. Three hundred sixty parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer completed questionnaires assessing the child's presence during the initial conversation with the oncologist about diagnosis and treatment and parental communication experiences. Primary oncologists completed a survey question about the child's prognosis. Sixty-one percent of children were present during the initial conversation, with lowest rates among children aged 3-6 (44%) and 7-12 (44%). Child presence was not associated with parents' reports that they received prognostic information (p = 0.20), high-quality information (p = 0.19), or high-quality communication about the child's cancer (p = 1.0). The parent's communication experience is not diminished by the choice to include the child. Given the bioethical imperative to include children in conversations about serious illness whenever possible, this concern should not be used to exclude children, but rather to give parents additional time of their own when needed to fully process decisions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 14%
Other 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Psychology 9 14%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,254,795
of 23,663,122 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#129
of 4,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,556
of 440,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,663,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.