You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Varying uses of the ABCD2 scoring system in primary and secondary care: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001501 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duncan Edwards, Simon R Cohn, Nahal Mavaddat, Satnam K Virdee, Daniel Lasserson, Siobhan Milner, Matthew Giles, Richard McManus, Jonathan Mant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#17,392
of 25,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,805
of 286,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#143
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.