| Title |
From tumors to species: a SCANDAL hypothesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Direct, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13062-019-0233-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Y. Panchin, V. V. Aleoshin, Y. V. Panchin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 11% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 45 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 80% |
| Scientists | 19 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#435,043
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#10
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,854
of 449,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them