| Title |
Using stable isotope data to advance marine food web modelling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-019-09552-4 |
| Authors |
Stacey A. McCormack, Rowan Trebilco, Jessica Melbourne-Thomas, Julia L. Blanchard, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Andrew Constable |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 11 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 6% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 3% |
| Croatia | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 54% |
| Scientists | 16 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 43 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 54 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,802,685
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#94
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,977
of 447,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.