↓ Skip to main content

Endemic pulmonary fungal diseases in immunocompetent patients: an emphasis on thoracic imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endemic pulmonary fungal diseases in immunocompetent patients: an emphasis on thoracic imaging
Published in
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/17476348.2019.1571914
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Luiza Di Mango, Gláucia Zanetti, Diana Penha, Miriam Menna Barreto, Edson Marchiori

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 21 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,555,094
of 25,145,981 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
#460
of 816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,659
of 449,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,145,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.