↓ Skip to main content

IMG/M: a data management and analysis system for metagenomes

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IMG/M: a data management and analysis system for metagenomes
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, December 2007
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkm869
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor M. Markowitz, Natalia N. Ivanova, Ernest Szeto, Krishna Palaniappan, Ken Chu, Daniel Dalevi, I-Min A. Chen, Yuri Grechkin, Inna Dubchak, Iain Anderson, Athanasios Lykidis, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C. Kyrpides

Abstract

IMG/M is a data management and analysis system for microbial community genomes (metagenomes) hosted at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI). IMG/M consists of metagenome data integrated with isolate microbial genomes from the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system. IMG/M provides IMG's comparative data analysis tools extended to handle metagenome data, together with metagenome-specific analysis tools. IMG/M is available at http://img.jgi.doe.gov/m.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 5%
Brazil 8 2%
Germany 5 1%
India 3 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 297 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 28%
Researcher 81 23%
Student > Master 42 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 5%
Other 57 16%
Unknown 28 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 182 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 14%
Computer Science 19 5%
Environmental Science 16 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 3%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 38 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,030,627
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#11,734
of 26,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,640
of 156,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#73
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.