Title |
The Optimal Treatment Plan to Avoid Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Differs by Surgical Strategy and Tumor Subtype
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-017-6016-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melissa Pilewskie, Emily C. Zabor, Anita Mamtani, Andrea V. Barrio, Michelle Stempel, Monica Morrow |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 8 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 52% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,248,766
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,310
of 6,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,919
of 316,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#35
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.