↓ Skip to main content

The Optimal Treatment Plan to Avoid Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Differs by Surgical Strategy and Tumor Subtype

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
The Optimal Treatment Plan to Avoid Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Differs by Surgical Strategy and Tumor Subtype
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2017
DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-6016-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa Pilewskie, Emily C. Zabor, Anita Mamtani, Andrea V. Barrio, Michelle Stempel, Monica Morrow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 19 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Psychology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,248,766
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,310
of 6,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,919
of 316,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#35
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.