| Title |
Elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the angiogenic effects of ginsenoside Rg1in vivo and in vitro
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Angiogenesis, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10456-005-9000-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Y.K. Yue, Daisy Y.L. Wong, W.Y. Ha, M.C. Fung, N.K. Mak, H.W. Yeung, H.W. Leung, Kelvin Chan, L. Liu, T.P.D. Fan, Ricky N.S. Wong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 42% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,281,784
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Angiogenesis
#55
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,099
of 146,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angiogenesis
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them