Title |
Mortality Not Correlated With Paclitaxel Exposure An Independent Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of a Drug-Coated Balloon
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.013 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter A Schneider, John R Laird, Gheorghe Doros, Qi Gao, Gary Ansel, Marianne Brodmann, Antonio Micari, Mehdi H Shishehbor, Gunnar Tepe, Thomas Zeller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 24 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
Argentina | 2 | 3% |
Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
China | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Georgia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 63% |
Scientists | 12 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 17% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 22% |
Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 46% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 38 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#475,172
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,177
of 16,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,798
of 450,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#30
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.