↓ Skip to main content

Robotic-assisted surgery for complicated and non-complicated diverticulitis: a single-surgeon case series

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Robotic Surgery, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Robotic-assisted surgery for complicated and non-complicated diverticulitis: a single-surgeon case series
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11701-018-00914-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Xia, Terrah Jean Paul Olson, Seth A. Rosen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 12 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,665,776
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Robotic Surgery
#508
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,642
of 437,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Robotic Surgery
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.