| Title |
Exploring the Justifications for Selecting a Drop Landing Task to Assess Injury Biomechanics: A Narrative Review and Analysis of Landings Performed by Female Netball Players
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-018-01045-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tyler J. Collings, Adam D. Gorman, Max C. Stuelcken, Daniel B. Mellifont, Mark G. L. Sayers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 19% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Qatar | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 41 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,409,724
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,747
of 2,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,614
of 447,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#34
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.