↓ Skip to main content

Multiple Novel Prostate Cancer Predisposition Loci Confirmed by an International Study: The PRACTICAL Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple Novel Prostate Cancer Predisposition Loci Confirmed by an International Study: The PRACTICAL Consortium
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, August 2008
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0317
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Douglas F Easton, Janet L Stanford, Elaine A Ostrander, Johanna Schleutker, Sue A Ingles, Daniel Schaid, Stephen Thibodeau, Thilo Dörk, David Neal, Jenny Donovan, Freddie Hamdy, Angela Cox, Christiane Maier, Walter Vogel, Michelle Guy, Kenneth Muir, Artitaya Lophatananon, Mary-Anne Kedda, Amanda Spurdle, Suzanne Steginga, Esther M John, Graham Giles, John Hopper, Pierre O Chappuis, Pierre Hutter, William D Foulkes, Nancy Hamel, Claudia A Salinas, Joseph S Koopmeiners, Danielle M Karyadi, Bo Johanneson, Tiina Wahlfors, Teuvo L Tammela, Mariana C Stern, Roman Corral, Shannon K McDonnell, Peter Schürmann, Andreas Meyer, Rainer Kuefer, Daniel A Leongamornlert, Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz, Jo-Fen Liu, Tracy O'Mara, R A Frank Gardiner, Joanne Aitken, Amit D Joshi, Gianluca Severi, Dallas R English, Melissa Southey, Stephen M Edwards, Ali Amin Al Olama, Rosalind A Eeles

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 87 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 20%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Professor 13 14%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Computer Science 9 9%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,551,190
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#2,149
of 4,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,927
of 93,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#30
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.