↓ Skip to main content

The performance of digital microscopy for primary diagnosis in human pathology: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Virchows Archiv, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
The performance of digital microscopy for primary diagnosis in human pathology: a systematic review
Published in
Virchows Archiv, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00428-018-02519-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo, Lady Paola Aristizábal Arboleda, Natalia Rangel Palmier, Jéssica Montenegro Fonsêca, Mariana de Pauli Paglioni, Wagner Gomes-Silva, Ana Carolina Prado Ribeiro, Thaís Bianca Brandão, Luciana Estevam Simonato, Paul M. Speight, Felipe Paiva Fonseca, Marcio Ajudarte Lopes, Oslei Paes de Almeida, Pablo Agustin Vargas, Cristhian Camilo Madrid Troconis, Alan Roger Santos-Silva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Other 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,383,546
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#301
of 2,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,454
of 449,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.