↓ Skip to main content

Nectar-foraging behavior of Euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in urban areas

Overview of attention for article published in Apidologie, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Nectar-foraging behavior of Euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in urban areas
Published in
Apidologie, June 2008
DOI 10.1051/apido:2008023
Authors

Margarita María López-Uribe, Cintia Akemi Oi, Marco Antonio Del Lama

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 123 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 61%
Environmental Science 22 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,583,598
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#265
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,855
of 82,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.