| Title |
Balneotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis—a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Biometeorology, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00484-015-1108-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabel Santos, Pedro Cantista, Carlos Vasconcelos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,824,421
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#145
of 1,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,496
of 388,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.