↓ Skip to main content

Are we there yet? Bevacizumab therapy for retinopathy of prematurity

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are we there yet? Bevacizumab therapy for retinopathy of prematurity
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, December 2011
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A Darlow, Anna L Ells, Clare E Gilbert, Glen A Gole, Graham E Quinn

Abstract

The publication of the BEAT-ROP study of bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment for Zone I and II retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) has raised hopes that there might now be a simpler, cheaper and more effective treatment than laser therapy, the current standard of care. However, we would urge caution at this point in time. We review the scientific background to the use of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for ROP, highlight a number of design issues in the BEAT-ROP study and problems with interpretation of the results. For example, no visual outcomes were reported and the study was underpowered to assess longer term safety. Intravitreal bevacizumab leaks into the systemic circulation in animals and adult humans and there are real concerns of potential harm to the developing preterm infant because vascular growth factors play a critical role in organogenesis. We conclude that bevacizumab should be reserved for exceptional circumstances and compassionate use pending further studies. Laser remains the proven effective therapy for first line treatment of all forms of ROP with little systemic morbidity. Neonatology and ophthalmology have an impressive record of conducting collaborative multicentre studies and we urgently need further rigorously designed, adequately powered randomised trials of anti-VEGF agents that evaluate visual outcomes as well as short and long term ocular and systemic safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Other 11 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 24 28%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 67%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#1,372
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,444
of 249,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.