| Title |
Comparison of Microlife BP A200 Plus and Omron M6 Blood Pressure Monitors to Detect Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertensive Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Therapy, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12325-011-0087-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe Marazzi, Ferdinando Iellamo, Maurizio Volterrani, Mauro Lombardo, Francesco Pelliccia, Daniela Righi, Fabrizia Grieco, Luca Cacciotti, Luigi Iaia, Giuseppe Caminiti, Giuseppe Rosano |
| Abstract |
Self-monitoring home blood pressure (BP) devices are currently recommended for long-term follow-up of hypertension and its management. Some of these devices are integrated with algorithms aimed at detecting atrial fibrillation (AF), which is common essential hypertension. This study was designed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two widely diffused home BP monitoring devices in detecting AF in an unselected population of outpatients referred to a hypertension clinic because of high BP. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 49% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,804,207
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#401
of 2,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,822
of 248,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.