↓ Skip to main content

Confocal fluorescence microscopy of plant cells

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, September 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Confocal fluorescence microscopy of plant cells
Published in
Protoplasma, September 1998
DOI 10.1007/bf01287411
Authors

Peter K. Hepler, Brian E. S. Gunning

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Student > Master 22 17%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 14%
Chemistry 9 7%
Engineering 6 5%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#134
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,924
of 32,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them