↓ Skip to main content

Validation of a self-efficacy instrument and its relationship to performance of crisis resource management skills

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Validation of a self-efficacy instrument and its relationship to performance of crisis resource management skills
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10459-011-9274-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L. Plant, Sandrijn M. van Schaik, Diane C. Sliwka, Christy K. Boscardin, Patricia S. O’Sullivan

Abstract

Self-efficacy is thought to be important for resuscitation proficiency in that it influences the development of and access to the associated medical knowledge, procedural skills and crisis resource management (CRM) skills. Since performance assessment of CRM skills is challenging, self-efficacy is often used as a measure of competence in this area. While self-efficacy may influence performance, the true relationship between self-efficacy and performance in this setting has not been delineated. We developed an instrument to measure pediatric residents' self-efficacy in CRM skills and assessed its content validity, internal structure, and relationship to other variables. After administering the instrument to 125 pediatric residents, critical care fellows and faculty, we performed an exploratory factor analysis within a confirmatory factor analysis as well as a known group comparison. The analyses specified four factors that we defined as: situation awareness, team management, environment management, and decision making. Pediatric residents reported lower self-efficacy than fellows and faculty in each factor. We also examined the correlation between self-efficacy and performance scores for a subset of 30 residents who led video recorded simulated resuscitations and had their performances rated by three observers. We found a significant, positive correlation between residents' self-efficacy in situation awareness and environment management and their overall performance of CRM skills. Our findings suggest that in a specific context, self-efficacy as a form of self-assessment may be informative with regards to performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 57 34%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 44%
Social Sciences 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Psychology 6 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,169,323
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#395
of 849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,821
of 182,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.