| Title |
Clinical outcome of pharmacist-led prospective audit with intervention and feedback after expansion from patients using specific antibiotics to those using whole injectable antibiotics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10096-018-03465-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kengo Ohashi, Tomoko Matsuoka, Yasutaka Shinoda, Takayuki Mori, Shinya Yoshida, Tomoaki Yoshimura, Tadashi Sugiyama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 22% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,887,746
of 23,507,405 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#591
of 2,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,460
of 440,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,405 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.