↓ Skip to main content

The cytoskeletal mechanics of brain morphogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, December 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The cytoskeletal mechanics of brain morphogenesis
Published in
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, December 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf02797122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Gordon, G. Wayne Brodland

Abstract

There is a functional device in embryonic ectodermal cells that we propose causes them to differentiate into either neuroepithelial or epidermal tissue during the process called primary neural induction. We call this apparatus the "cell state splitter." Its main components are the apical microfilament ring and the coplanar apical mat of microtubules, which exert forces in opposite radial directions. We analyze the mechanical interaction between these cytoskeletal components and show that they are in an unstable mechanical equilibrium. The role of the cell state splitter is thus to create a mechanical instability corresponding to the embryonic state of "competence" in an otherwise mechanically stable cell. When the equilibrium of the cell state splitter is disturbed so as to produce a slight contraction of the apical end, apical contraction continues and the distinctive columnar neuroepithelial cells are produced. A slight expansion from the equilibrium state, on the other hand, results in flattened epidermal cells. The calculated forces are consistent with the known constitutive and force-generating properties and morphology of microfilaments and microtubules, and with free tubulin concentrations. There are no free parameters in the analysis. The first cells to assume the neuroepithelial state lie over the notochord. Propagation of the neuroepithelial state (homoiogenetic induction) then proceeds via stretch-induced constriction of the apical microfilament rings, until a hemisphere is covered, at which point the high rate of change of the meridional stress component necessary for further propagation vanishes. The remaining cells are stretched somewhat by this process and become epidermis. A sharp boundary between the tissues is thus formed (explaining "compartmentalization" and the binary nature of differentiation in general). Normal induction apparently involves setup of the cell state splitters in all of the ectoderm cells, perhaps synchronously timed by global embryo tension. The initial transition of cells from the ectodermal to the neuroepithelial state begins at the notoplate, where cell attachments to the notochord may both cause basal actin deposition and significantly reduce the stress induced in the ectoderm by the global tension, biasing the notoplate cell state splitters toward the neuroepithelial state. Introduction of an organizer or other solid substrate (artificial inducer) elsewhere, to which ectodermal cells can adhere, may likewise have both of these effects. Differentiation to either epidermis or neuroepithelium is thus a mechanical event followed by the synthesis of specific proteins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Researcher 3 27%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Engineering 3 27%
Mathematics 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#159
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,530
of 49,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them