| Title |
A low-cost and open-source platform for automated imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0392-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Max R. Lien, Richard J. Barker, Zhiwei Ye, Matthew H. Westphall, Ruohan Gao, Aditya Singh, Simon Gilroy, Philip A. Townsend |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 37% |
| Engineering | 11 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,817,747
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#79
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,249
of 449,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.