↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Factors and Appropriate Lymph Node Dissection in Salvage Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced T4 Esophageal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic Factors and Appropriate Lymph Node Dissection in Salvage Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced T4 Esophageal Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-7074-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Ohkura, Masaki Ueno, Toshiro Iizuka, Harushi Udagawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Master 5 31%
Lecturer 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Philosophy 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,202,665
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,038
of 6,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,797
of 437,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#44
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.