↓ Skip to main content

Colonic hypereosinophilia in ulcerative colitis may help to predict the failure of steroid therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Colonic hypereosinophilia in ulcerative colitis may help to predict the failure of steroid therapy
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10151-018-1896-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Leoncini, Vincenzo Villanacci, Maria Grazia Marin, Valentina Crisafulli, Moris Cadei, Elisabetta Antonelli, Claudio Leoci, Gabrio Bassotti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Computer Science 2 10%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,005,961
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#1,037
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,639
of 436,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#37
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.