| Title |
New indicators and indexes for benchmarking university–industry–government innovation in medical and life science clusters: results from the European FP7 Regions of Knowledge HealthTIES project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0414-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurel D. Edmunds, Silvia Gluderer, Pavel V. Ovseiko, Roel Kamerling, Jacqueline Ton, Laura Vis, Mario Jenni, Gregory Tutton, Helen Lawton-Smith, Márta Völgyiné Nadabán, Máté Rab, Jon Rees, John Anson, Alexander D. Rushforth, Maxine Allen, Alastair M. Buchan, Montserrat Vendrell, Alex Casta, Gábor Mehes, Pancras C. W. Hogendoorn, Ernst Hafen, A. Bassim Hassan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 46 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 49 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,507,681
of 23,934,148 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#359
of 1,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,062
of 442,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#20
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,934,148 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.