You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethnographic Decision Modeling to Understand Smallholder Antibiotic Use for Poultry in Guatemala
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Anthropology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1080/01459740.2018.1550755 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy E. Snively-Martinez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| South Africa | 2 | 25% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 13% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 22% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,891,297
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Medical Anthropology
#98
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,590
of 437,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Anthropology
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.