↓ Skip to main content

Individual differences in negative affect repair style

Overview of attention for article published in Motivation and Emotion, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Individual differences in negative affect repair style
Published in
Motivation and Emotion, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11031-019-09752-2
Authors

Scott H. Hemenover, Colin R. Harbke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 33%
Mathematics 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,128,890
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Motivation and Emotion
#324
of 792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,257
of 443,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Motivation and Emotion
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.