↓ Skip to main content

Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
Title
Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13018-019-1066-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zaid Al-Boloushi, Eva María Gómez-Trullén, Pablo Bellosta-López, María Pilar López-Royo, Daniel Fernández, Pablo Herrero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 229 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 16%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 9 4%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 116 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 50 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 121 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,334,681
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#314
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,151
of 437,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.