You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stromal-derived interleukin 6 drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and therapy resistance in esophageal adenocarcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1820459116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva A. Ebbing, Amber P. van der Zalm, Anne Steins, Aafke Creemers, Simone Hermsen, Rosa Rentenaar, Michelle Klein, Cynthia Waasdorp, Gerrit K. J. Hooijer, Sybren L. Meijer, Kausilia K. Krishnadath, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Otto M. van Delden, Maarten C. C. M. Hulshof, Jan Paul Medema, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Maarten F. Bijlsma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,665,113
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#62,482
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,695
of 446,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#766
of 1,007 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,007 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.