↓ Skip to main content

3D-BV-adjustierte perkutane trianguläre Stabilisierung der geriatrischen Beckenringfraktur

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
3D-BV-adjustierte perkutane trianguläre Stabilisierung der geriatrischen Beckenringfraktur
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00113-019-0606-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Spalteholz, Jens Gulow

Abstract

The 3D image enhancer-adjusted percutaneous triangular stabilization of geriatric pelvic ring fractures avoids implant-associated perioperative complications. Displaced fractures of the posterior pelvic ring require stable instrumentation to enable solid bony fusion in a balanced alignment and to control the risk of neurological and vascular damage. This is mandatory in high-energy injuries in young patients and especially in low-energy injuries of geriatric patients. Various surgical techniques have been established. The triangular stabilization technique shows the best biomechanical results. The percutaneous instrumentation reduces access-related morbidity and provides all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. In order to avoid implant-associated complications, such as vascular and nerve injuries, anatomical and radiological principles are indispensable. The use of 3D image enhancement ensures a safe instrumentation. Nevertheless, pitfalls have to be considered. This article presents the technique of percutaneous triangular stabilization using the 3D scan. After percutaneous insertion of the guide wires into the L4 vertebral body, the iliac bone and transiliosacrally under 2D X‑ray control, the correct wire position is verified by the 3D scan. Then, screws are inserted and the instrumentation is completed in a standard fashion. Using this technique implant-associated perioperative complications, such as nerve and vascular damage due to screw misplacement can be reduced.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Design 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#439
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#385,768
of 446,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.