↓ Skip to main content

Exploring experiences of people participation activities in a British national health service trust: a service user-led research project

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 521)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
72 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Exploring experiences of people participation activities in a British national health service trust: a service user-led research project
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40900-019-0140-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Curwen, Jane Fernandes, Rachael Howison, Paul Binfield, Frank Rohricht, Domenico Giacco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#840,485
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#47
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,548
of 449,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.