| Title |
Disease-related factors affecting timely lymphoma diagnosis: a qualitative study exploring patient experiences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x701009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Debra A Howell, Ruth I Hart, Alexandra G Smith, Una Macleod, Russell Patmore, Eve Roman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 60% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,012,872
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#474
of 4,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,812
of 440,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#17
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.