| Title |
A global perspective on coal-fired power plants and burden of lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12940-019-0448-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheng-Kuan Lin, Ro-Ting Lin, Tom Chen, Corwin Zigler, Yaguang Wei, David C. Christiani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 18% |
| Turkey | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 84% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 25% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#617,641
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#169
of 1,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,197
of 449,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.