↓ Skip to main content

Enteral feeding outcomes after chemoradiotherapy for oropharynx cancer: A role for a prophylactic gastrostomy?

Overview of attention for article published in Oral Oncology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enteral feeding outcomes after chemoradiotherapy for oropharynx cancer: A role for a prophylactic gastrostomy?
Published in
Oral Oncology, December 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.11.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian F. Williams, Mark T.W. Teo, Mehmet Sen, Karen E. Dyker, Catherine Coyle, Robin J.D. Prestwich

Abstract

To determine the outcomes of patients managed with different routes of enteral feeding during chemoradiotherapy for oropharynx cancer. The hospital and dietetic records of consecutive patients with oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma treated between January 2007 and June 2009 with concurrent chemoradiotherapy were reviewed retrospectively. One hundred and four patients were analysed. Seventy-one received a prophylactic gastrostomy, 21 were managed with a strategy of NG tube as required and 12 received a therapeutic gastrostomy. Patients with a prophylactic gastrostomy commenced enteral feeding a median of 24 days after commencing radiotherapy, compared with a median of 41 days (p<0.001) for the NG as required group. Comparing prophylactic gastrostomy, NG as required and therapeutic gastrostomy, median number of unplanned inpatient days were 6, 14 and 7, respectively (p<0.01 for prophylactic gastrostomy vs. NG as required). Mean percentage weight loss at the end of treatment (6.1% vs. 7.1% vs. 5.2%, respectively) and at 6 months post-radiotherapy (11.7%, 14.3% and 8.9%) were similar in all groups (p=0.23). There was no significant difference in type of diet post-radiotherapy between prophylactic gastrostomy and NG as required groups (p=0.22). Median duration of enteral feeding was 181, 64 and 644 days, respectively (p<0.01 for prophylactic gastrostomy vs. NG as required). Use of a prophylactic gastrostomy (p<0.01) and higher T stage (p<0.01) were associated with increased duration of enteral feeding on a multivariate analysis. These data reinforce concerns regarding the detrimental impact of prophylactic gastrostomy placement upon long-term enteral feed dependence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Oral Oncology
#1,601
of 1,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,035
of 249,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oral Oncology
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.