| Title |
Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Messina, Davide Colombo, Federico Lorenzo Barra, Gianmaria Cammarota, Giacomo De Mattei, Federico Longhini, Stefano Romagnoli, Francesco DellaCorte, Daniel De Backer, Maurizio Cecconi, Paolo Navalesi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Mexico | 3 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 72% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,750,890
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,536
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,111
of 446,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#37
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.