↓ Skip to main content

Selection rules for topology change

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, August 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Selection rules for topology change
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, August 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02100864
Authors

G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Librarian 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 16 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 16 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,836,083
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#1,160
of 2,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,558
of 18,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.