You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stratification of reactivity determines nitrate removal in groundwater
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1816892116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Kolbe, Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy, Benjamin W. Abbott, Luc Aquilina, Tristan Babey, Christopher T. Green, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Thierry Labasque, Anniet M. Laverman, Jean Marçais, Stefan Peiffer, Zahra Thomas, Gilles Pinay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| France | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 46 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,508,358
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#20,351
of 103,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,266
of 449,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#399
of 992 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 992 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.