| Title |
Zika Virus in Peridomestic Neotropical Primates, Northeast Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-019-01394-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvana R. Favoretto, Danielle B. Araujo, Naylê F. H. Duarte, Danielle B. L. Oliveira, Nathalia G. da Crus, Flavio Mesquita, Fabyano Leal, Rafael R. G. Machado, Fernanda Gaio, Walber F. Oliveira, Paolo M. A. Zanotto, Edison L. Durigon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 2 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#13,903,378
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#485
of 713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,599
of 440,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.