| Title |
Spatial mapping shows that some African elephants use cognitive maps to navigate the core but not the periphery of their home ranges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-019-01242-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Presotto, Richard Fayrer-Hosken, Caitlin Curry, Marguerite Madden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 17% |
| South Africa | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 15% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,888,956
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,097
of 1,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,707
of 445,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#24
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.