| Title |
Care plans for women pregnant using assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-019-0667-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria P. Velez, Candyce Hamel, Brian Hutton, Laura Gaudet, Mark Walker, Micere Thuku, Kelly D. Cobey, Misty Pratt, Becky Skidmore, Graeme N. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 55 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 20% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,838,604
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#579
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,843
of 438,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#21
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.